Understanding prognosis language
The short answer
Doctors are trained to describe probabilities. Parents hear predictions. That gap causes a great deal of unnecessary pain in both directions.
The most useful question you can ask is not "will my child walk." It is "what would you expect to see by six months if things are going well, and what would concern you."
The numbers, up front
- Statistics describe groups
- A statistic tells you what happened across a population. It does not tell you what will happen to one child 1
- Imaging predicts better than history
- In newborn brain injury, MRI findings predict outcome better than the birth history does 2
- Function is described by level
- For cerebral palsy, the GMFCS level predicts everyday function better than the diagnosis, and it is generally stable from about age 2 3
- Movement does not predict thinking
- Intellectual ability varies widely at every level of motor function, and children with severe motor impairment are the most often underestimated 1
- Early diagnosis is possible
- A confident diagnosis or a high-risk designation can be made before 6 months corrected age using imaging, a standardized motor assessment and a neurological exam 4
- Cause is a pattern, not a test
- Professional guidance states that cause and timing of newborn brain injury are established from a pattern of findings taken together 5
What the words usually mean
"We will have to wait and see." Usually true. It often also means the doctor does not want to say something they cannot support. Ask what they are waiting to see, and when.
"Guarded." Serious, and uncertain.
"Time will tell." Same as above. Ask what would change their assessment.
"Every child is different." True, and often a way of avoiding a number. Ask instead for the range: what does the best case look like, what does the worst, and where does my child sit today.
"He may never walk." This is a probability, not a verdict. Ask what it is based on. If it is based on an MRI and a motor assessment, that is meaningful. If it is based on a difficult birth, it is much weaker.
"She is doing well." Ask, doing well compared to what. Compared to yesterday, or compared to other children her age.
"Significant brain injury." Ask which parts of the brain, and what those parts do.
Better questions to ask
Replace prediction questions with observation questions. You get more, and you get answers a doctor can actually stand behind.
Instead of "will my child walk," ask:
- What would you expect to see by 6 months if things are going well?
- What would concern you?
- What are you watching for at each visit?
Instead of "how bad is it," ask:
- Which parts of the brain are affected, and what do those parts do?
- What did the MRI show, and when was it done?
- Which parts of this are you confident about, and which are uncertain?
Instead of "what does the future look like," ask:
- What can we do now that we will be glad we did in five years?
- What would change your assessment?
- When would you reassess?
One more, and it works everywhere:
- What would you want to know if this were your child?
What statistics can and cannot do
A statistic describes a group. It cannot tell you what will happen to one child.
"Most children with this do X" is genuinely useful for planning, and useless for prediction. Your child is one child, not a distribution.
What predicts better
Imaging. In newborn brain injury, MRI findings predict outcome better than the birth history does. 2
How your child develops over the first year or two. The trajectory tells you more than any single assessment.
Functional level. For cerebral palsy, the GMFCS level predicts everyday function better than the diagnosis, and it is generally stable from about age 2. 3
What predicts badly
The Apgar score alone. Guidance says plainly it should not be used on its own to predict outcome. 6
The birth story alone.
A single assessment on a single day, particularly of a child who was tired, hungry, or unwell.
The mistake that matters most
Movement ability does not predict thinking ability.
A child who cannot walk or speak may have typical intelligence. Children with severe motor impairment are the group most often underestimated, because the muscles used for speech are affected by the same injury that affects the body. 1
This has consequences. A child assumed to have limited understanding is spoken to differently, taught differently, and given fewer chances to show what they know.
Assume competence. Get communication assessed properly and early. Then let your child show you.
If you take one thing from this page, take that.
Holding hope and uncertainty at the same time
You will meet two unhelpful versions of this.
The bleak version. Everything framed as loss, delivered to a parent who has just had a baby, sometimes on day one.
The empty version. "Every child is different, just love them," which tells you nothing and leaves you unprepared.
Neither is what you need. What helps is specific information with clear limits. Here is what we know, here is what we do not, here is what we are watching for.
You are allowed to hope and to plan for difficulty at the same time. Most families end up doing both. Applying for the waiver does not mean giving up. Celebrating progress does not mean denial.
One practical thing
Write down what you are told, with the date and who said it. Prognosis conversations happen when you are least able to absorb them, and predictions made at one week look very different at one year. Keeping the record lets you see how much things changed, which is often more than anyone expected in either direction.
Questions parents ask
The doctor will not give me a straight answer. Why?
Usually because they cannot support one, and they know a number given at one week will be quoted back for years. Ask observation questions instead: what would you expect by 6 months if things are going well, what would concern you, and what are you watching for. Those get real answers.
Someone told us our child will never walk. Should we believe it?
Ask what it is based on. A prediction grounded in an MRI and a standardized motor assessment carries weight. 2 4 One based on the birth story carries much less. Also ask what would change the assessment and when they would reassess.
Is it too early for anyone to say?
For a diagnosis, often no. A confident diagnosis or high-risk designation can be made before 6 months corrected age using imaging, a standardized motor assessment and a neurological exam. 4 For a detailed prediction about adult life, yes, it is too early, and it stays too early for a long time.
How do I stop searching for statistics at 2 a.m.?
Most people do not stop entirely. What helps is changing what you look for. Statistics about groups will not tell you about your child. What is useful is knowing what to watch for and what to do next. That is what your team can give you, and it is what most of this site is for.
Words on this page, in plain English
- MRI
- Magnetic resonance imaging. A scan that uses magnets, not X-rays, to make detailed pictures of the brain.
- cerebral palsy
- A group of lifelong conditions that affect movement and posture. They come from an injury or difference in the developing brain. The brain injury does not get worse over time, but the body effects can change.
- GMFCS
- The Gross Motor Function Classification System. A five-level scale that describes how a child with cerebral palsy moves. Level I is walking without limits. Level V is being moved in a wheelchair by someone else.
- Medicaid waiver
- A state program that lets a child get Medicaid based on their own needs and income rather than the family's. Many have waiting lists.
Where these facts come from
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Cerebral Palsy. 2025. www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/cerebral-pals. Link checked September 3, 2026.
- Elsevier. Volpe's Neurology of the Newborn, Sixth Edition. 2018. www.elsevier.com/books/volpes-neurology-of-the-newborn/volpe. Link checked September 3, 2026.
- CanChild, McMaster University. Gross Motor Function Classification System, Expanded and Revised (GMFCS-E&R). 2007. canchild.ca/en/resources/42-gross-motor-function-classificat. Link checked September 3, 2026.
- JAMA Pediatrics. Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy. 2017. jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2636588. Link checked September 3, 2026.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American Academy of Pediatrics. Neonatal Encephalopathy and Neurologic Outcome, Second Edition. 2014. www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/task-force-report/ar. Link checked September 3, 2026.
- American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion 644, The Apgar Score. 2015. www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion. Link checked September 3, 2026.